Skip to main content
Lifetime license included with every purchase
Comparison

n8n vs Make — pricing, features, and verdict

Make's visual canvas is genuinely beautiful and handles iteration better than Zapier. n8n covers the same workflow shapes plus self-hosting and inline code. The choice usually comes down to whether you need code flexibility and data residency control, or whether you prefer Make's polished UX.

n8n

This one

Open-source workflow automation with 400+ nodes, self-hostable for free, unlimited executions on your own server. Pair with pre-built templates from n8n Template Store for instant time-to-value.

Pricing: n8n: free self-hosted, n8n Cloud from €20/mo. n8n Template Store templates: one-time $7–$29 each, bundle covers full catalog.

Make

Visual automation canvas with iterators, aggregators, and a polished UI. Per-operation pricing, EU-hosted, sits between Zapier (simpler) and n8n (deeper).

Pricing: Free tier (1,000 ops/mo), Core $10.59/mo (10,000 ops), Pro $18.82/mo, Teams from $34.12/mo.

Feature matrix

Side-by-side comparison

Featuren8nMake
Self-hostable
n8n self-host runs on a $5–$10/mo VPS with unlimited executions.
YesNo
Pricing modelFree self-hosted; one-time template purchasePer-operation subscription ($10.59–$34.12+/mo)
Integration count400+ native nodes + HTTP Request for any REST API1,800+ pre-built app modules
Branching (if / switch / multi-path)YesRouter (multi-path)
Loops & iteration over arraysYesIterator + Aggregator modules
Inline code (JavaScript / Python)JavaScript or Python in every Code nodeFunctions module (limited expressions, no full code)
Sub-workflows / reusable componentsYesNo
Error handling & retry policiesPer-node retries + dedicated error triggersError handler routes per module
Data residencyYour server (self-hosted) or EU (n8n Cloud)EU (Integromat heritage), Make-hosted
Learning curveModerateModerate
Ready-made workflow templatesYes — n8n Template Store catalog, one-time purchaseVendor template gallery (varies in depth)
Why pick n8n

Where n8n + n8n Template Store wins

Self-hosting and unlimited executions

Make charges per operation; a complex scenario can burn through 10,000 ops in a single day. Self-hosted n8n runs unlimited executions on your own server with zero per-op meter.

Full JavaScript in every Code node

Make's Functions module covers expressions but not arbitrary code. Need to call a private API, hash a value, or normalise messy JSON? n8n's Code node runs JavaScript or Python; Make pushes you to external Webhooks.

Data stays on your infrastructure

Self-hosted n8n means workflow data, credentials, and execution logs never leave your server. Make is EU-hosted regardless of where your customers live — that matters for some compliance regimes.

One-time template pricing

Make's template gallery is free but locks you into their per-operation meter. n8n Template Store templates are one-time purchases; you own the workflow JSON.

Honest tradeoffs

When Make wins

Make wins on first-time UX. The canvas is more polished than n8n's, the iterator/aggregator pattern is easier to learn than n8n's loop primitives, and the free tier is more generous (1,000 ops/mo vs n8n Cloud's lower tier). For non-technical users who don't need code, Make is the smoother on-ramp.

Choose Make if

You want the prettiest visual canvas, you don't need inline code, and your operation count stays comfortably inside the Core plan ($10.59/mo).

Choose n8n if

You need data residency control, inline JavaScript or Python, sub-workflows, or you want to escape the per-operation meter as your volume grows.

FAQ

About this comparison

Is Make actually easier than n8n?
Slightly, for the first workflow. The canvas is more guided and iterators are more intuitive than n8n's loop nodes. Past the third or fourth workflow the difference disappears, and n8n's debugging tools (per-node output inspection, execution history) pull ahead.
How do operation counts compare?
Make counts every module run as an operation. A 5-step scenario processing 100 items costs 500 ops. n8n self-hosted has no equivalent meter; n8n Cloud counts executions (one execution per workflow run, regardless of step count).
Can I migrate a Make scenario to n8n?
Not automatically. The data shape is similar but the node libraries differ. Most migrations are faster as a rebuild from scratch using an n8n template as the starting point.